Gmos

Shayna Powell GMO Helpful or unwhole more or less? The battle about genetically modified forage is intensifying more and more each day as to whether it is doing more harm than good to the health of the environment and the general population. art object there is some potential for a successful GMO world, there argon far too many risks and safety factors involved. The factors implicate the unknown consequences of eating GMOs, the effect of genetic technology on the environment and genetic diversity, and the massive amounts of herbicides, pesticides, and fungicides involve in GMOs.These products argon unsafe, un rude(a), and have the potential to sweat irreversible damage in the next. Others who disagree king argue that GMOs increase food supply, tolerance of acetous environmental conditions on rationalizes, and pest and disease resistance. While these arguments may have some validity, the idea that these products send word be very unsafe and damaging cannot be excused beca use of these pros. First, genetic engineering can mortify genetic diversity. Plants with reduced genetic diversity cannot wish drought, fungus, or pests as well as natural plants can.GMOs strengthen homogeneity and increase the vulnerability of crops to environmental changes. There is also a concern for the airing of altered genes to weeds and other wild relatives creating super-weeds that volition be resistant to herbicides found in GMOs. This in turn would defeat the purpose of genetically engineering crops. In the end, the GM process will be more costly to farmers and agriculture itself. In addition, GMOs submit massive amounts of herbicides, pesticides, and fungicides.According to Mark Anslow, Ecologist Editor, no genetically modifies crop has yet eliminated the need for chemical fertilizers in hostelry to achieve expected yields. (Anslow, 464) Also, these chemicals are poisonous and should neer be eaten. Why then would companies such as Syngenta and Monsanto find it s afe for humans to ingest such poison? Finally, the consequences of eating GM products are widely unknown. Experts say that 60 to 70 percent of touch on foods have ingredients that have been genetically modified. That means that nigh breakfast cereals, snack foods, some baby foods, sodas and oils are being consumed without known risks.In addition, food items that contain GMOs are not labeled in America. According to Jeffrey smith altered nutrients and toxins can result in developmental problems. (Smith, 471) This has resulted in the nutritional studies on young and create animals. However humans are very diverse from animals and could have far different reactions than those shown form tests require on animals. In order to prevent future disasters, long-term studies of biotech foods should be conducted to determine long-term cause. In conclusion, too many risk factors exist for GMOs to be overlooked as a harmless biological advancement.Studies should be done overtime to reve al what effects genetically engineered food can have on the environment and the consumers in the future. While trying to make a quick-fix in the shortcoming of nature, responsible actions should be taken to ensure the safety and well-being of those partaking in the GMO movement. Works Cited Anslow, Mark. Ten Reasons Why GM Wont apply the World. Good Reasons with Contemporary Arguments Smith, Jeffrey. Another Reason for Schools to throw out Genetically Modified Foods Good Reasons with Contemporary Arguments